Ìööö Áòòù Blockinøøóò Ú׺ Äóóó×øø Êêêöö×××óòò

Ý×××ò Aeaeøûóöö׸êùðð Áòòù Blockinøøóò Òò Äóóó×øø Êêêöö×××óò Ò Øøø Ôöööö Blockinøøóò Óó Øøø ×ùöúúúð Óó Ûóññò ×ù««ööòò Öóñ Ööö×ø Ò Blockin Blockinö

Áòòóöññøøóò Üøöö Blockinøøóò Öóñ Ï È× ××× Óò ¹øø×øøøðð Ìööö Ùøóññøóò Áòòù Blockinøøóò´´üøøòòòò ×øöö Blockinøµ

Üôöö×××ú Äóóó Blockin× Óö Óóððððöö× Úúú Ìöññòòð Ëëõùùò Áòòù Blockinøøóò

Óñôôöö×óò Óó Äóóó×øø Êêêöö×××óò Øó ××óò Ìööö Áòòù Blockinøøóò Ò Øøø Òó××× Óó Öôôð Ìùòòòð Ëýòòöóññ

This paper aims to ompare and ontrast two types of model (logisti regression and de ision tree indu tion) for the diagnosis of arpal tunnel syndrome using four ordered lassi ation ategories. Initially, we present the lassi ation performan e results based on more than two ovariates (multivariate ase). Our results suggest that there is no signi ant di eren e between the two methods. Further to th...

Øø ×øöö Blockinøøóò Óö Ý Blockinðð Áòøøò××ú Èöóóööñ× Aeaeøø××× Ëëëöýýýòò Òò Ââññ× º Öóûòò Ììì Íòòúö××øý Óó Ìüü× Ø Ù×øøò¸ù×øøò¸ìì¸íëë ½¾